| | | | | | | | |
visit www.clemmer.net
|
|
| Culture Change Starts with the Management Team |
| | |
Culture
change and development continues to be a major concern for many
managers. For very good reason: Research shows that an organization's
culture ("what we pay attention to and how we do things around here")
is the key factor in determining performance.
But
too many management teams approach "change management" as an issue of
changing the way everyone else operates. They rarely understand that
the culture of their whole organization or the "micro climate" of their
division or department is most clearly defined by how the management
team operates. The dynamics of the management team ripple outward to
create the dynamics of the culture they lead.
I recently wrote a feature article on this which ran in The Globe and Mail. It is full of tips, tools, and techniques for management team development. Click here to read it now.
I was also interviewed on this topic by HR.com, where I gave examples of my work with management teams. Click here to read the interview now.
|
| The Power of Strategic Pessimism |
|
| |
|
Following is correspondence from Leader Letter
reader, Ken Larson, in Calgary, Alberta. His insights and useful
comments are in response to the article I wrote in last month's Leader Letter, entitled "Choosing My Perspective." (click here to read it).
Hi Jim,
Research on the The Positive Power of Negative Thinking
by Julie K. Norem shows that there is a group of high achievers that
are classed as traditional pessimists. However, these "pessimists" (by
definition) use their pessimism to their benefit - they are strategic
about it. Here's the deal...
- A strategic pessimist sees the negative in a situation, and then becomes motivated to make sure it doesn't happen.
- A strategic optimist sees the positive in a situation, then becomes motivated to make sure it does happen.
- Additional
findings showed that when you try to convert a strategic pessimist to
become more optimistic, they fail miserably. The opposite held true for
strategic optimists trying the strategy of the strategic pessimists.
Interesting?
I have found this helps greatly in my executive coaching as it doesn't
really matter if one is optimistic or pessimistic, as long as they are
"strategic" about it, and stick to what works for them. I have found a
lot of executives are relieved to hear this news (that they aren't
'bad') and then realize that they don't have to change, they just have
to become more aware of it, use what works for them, but also be
willing to shift to the other side when necessary (when they go home to
the family?). This has huge ramifications for handling all sorts of
situations. For example, I really want the mechanic on the airliner I
fly on to be a strategic pessimist - find all that could go wrong and
make absolute sure that it doesn't happen.
Thoughts?
Ken
Hi Ken,
Thanks for your interesting research and perspective.
I
can see the value of strategic pessimism in many organizational
situations. I can also see the times when it would make sense for
personal situations. But the big danger in this concept is that it
gives permission to pessimists to continue their sour outlook on life.
Overwhelming research shows this leads to disastrous physical and
mental results, not to mention broken relationships and other side
effects.
There's an important distinction
to be made between life pessimism and situational pessimism. That's
where Seligman's 3Ps (permanent, pervasive, and personal) of
explanatory style are the most helpful. I certainly agree that I want
the airplane mechanic (or pilot) to be strategically pessimistic.
Jim
Jim,
You
are absolutely correct - strategic pessimists don't allow their
negative outlook on life to affect them. It is much closer to
situational pessimism than life pessimism as you suggest - but perhaps
a step further, in that they tend to look at the down side purely for
the potential benefits of knowing what could go wrong as a means of
better assessing the situation AND motivating them to achieve in spite
of these.
This lends itself to the
notion that although we are all pre-disposed to a certain explanatory
style, there is a great need in our present society to be able (and
willing) to shift our outlook depending upon the situation, whether it
be in life or business.
To me it
all comes down to the element of perceived risk - when there is a lot,
then a strategically pessimistic outlook will help (survival
mechanism?) – as long as the emotions of the situation don't cloud our
view and wear down our internal mechanisms (as the research shows to be
true). This is both a talent as much as a skill.
I did my masters thesis on explanatory style. Believe me, the "Three P's" are etched into my brain for all eternity :) :) :).
|
| |
|
| Sorting Out the Muddle of Vision, Mission, Goal, Objective, and Purpose |
|
| |
A web site visitor from India recently e-mailed me this question:
To
me 'Goal,' 'Objective,' 'Purpose,' and 'Mission' are synonymous. And
'Vision' is something beyond 'Mission.' If success is the 'Mission'
then more-than-success is the 'Vision' for an organization. Am I
correct? Please verify.
Here's my response:
Thanks for your question. This area can be very confusing. Below are two excerpts from my new book, The Leader's Digest: Timeless Principles for Team and Organization Success, that address your questions. You can view more of the book and order it on our web site.
It
wasn't by accident that we chose to arrange the timeless leadership
principles in the shape of a wheel. Of all the principles, there is one
that is central, one from which the others emanate, much as spokes
radiate from the hub of a wheel. That core principle is Focus and
Context. So what is this all-important principle? In fact, it consists
of three interrelated parts, which are defined by the answers to three
key questions:
- Where are we going (the vision or picture of our preferred future or outcome)?
- What do we believe in (our guiding values or principles)?
- Why do we exist (our reason for being, mission, or purpose)?
These
questions are about as simple as I can make them. And this is
important, because they can become overly complicated. Over the years
I've engaged in too many "vernacular engineering" debates with
colleagues and management teams that get enmeshed in numerous
definitions of visions, values, mission statements, and the like. Too
often we are just splitting hairs (which, given my follicular
challenges, is something I really can't afford to do) without really
adding value to our understanding and application of the important
leadership principles.
So I usually try to reduce Focus and Context to its key components, using these terms: Vision, Values, and Purpose.
Managers set goals, leaders have vision
Just
as the terms "management" and "leadership" are often used
interchangeably, goals and visions are often perceived to be the same
thing. They are not. While both are critical to success (and are
therefore highly interconnected), the management act of goal-setting is
quite different from the leadership act of visioning.
|
Goals
|
Vision
|
| Appeals to our intellect |
Engages our emotions |
| Results and timeframes |
A desired future state |
| Builds a business case |
Kindles a cause |
| Rational |
Intuitive |
| Pushes performance |
Inspires and aligns |
| Targets and objectives |
Images and feelings |
| Solves problems |
Imagines possibilities |
| Logical progression |
Irrational "skyhooks" |
| Written |
Verbal |
|
|

Permission to Reprint: You may reprint any items from the Leader Letter in your own print publication or e-newsletter as long as you include this paragraph:
|
"Reprinted with permission from the Leader Letter,
Jim Clemmer's free e-newsletter. Jim Clemmer is a bestselling author
and internationally acclaimed keynote speaker, workshop/ retreat
leader, and management team developer on leadership, change, customer
focus, culture, and personal growth. His web site is www.clemmer.net."
|
|
| Performance Management Versus Coaching |
|
| |
A new Leader Letter subscriber from South Africa wrote and asked for my views on performance management. Here's my reply:
My
discussions about performance management are generally approached
through coaching. A huge problem with many performance management
systems is that they are nothing more than bureaucratic exercises that
frustrate the person on the receiving end and are a great chore to the
manager doing them. The original intent of getting manager and team
member talking to each other about his or her performance is dead on.
The execution is often lacking.
You can find a few references to coaching in my February newsletter. I have written more extensively about coaching in my latest book, The Leader's Digest: Timeless Principles for Team and Organization Success. You can read an excerpt from the book that deals with coaching at http://www.clemmer.net/excerpts/cultivating_lship.shtml. Another excerpt on growing others is on our web site at http://www.clemmer.net/excerpts/growing_others.shtml.
|
|
If you are reading a copy of this newsletter that was passed along to you, ensure you don't miss future issues by subscribing here. |
| Nominate a Hero Who's Making a Difference |
|
| |
|
I've
long admired Carl Hiebert's photographic books, cherished his
friendship, and been inspired by his triumph over personal tragedy
(read an excerpt about Carl here)
and selfless work in helping less fortunate people around the world.
Carl is working on an inspiring new project to shine a well deserved
spotlight on Canadians who are really making a difference. He needs
help finding them. Visit his new web site at www.canadiansmakingadifference.com
to learn more and nominate a deserving hero. You'll help Carl, bring
recognition to a deserving hero, and contribute to fighting the
HIV/AIDS epidemic in Third World countries.
|
Thoughts that Make You Go Hmmm...
on Management Team Development |
|
| |
"I am because we are."
- African proverb
"When
you have conflict at the top, and it is handled dysfunctionally, it
sends shock waves through the entire organization – not ripples, but
shock waves. The senior team is, for better or for worse, the
organization's model of what a high-performing team is. If your senior
team operates in a dysfunctional manner not only does it cause
disconnects and decision-making snafus, it also sets up a dysfunctional
model for the organization to emulate and that's really the worst
problem."
- Howard Guttman, author of When Goliaths Clash
"While
the first words and actions of leaders are the most closely attended
to, the scrutiny never really ends. Followers continue to pay close
attention to even the most offhand remark, and the more effective the
leader is, the more careful he or she must be, because followers may
implement an idea that was little more than a passing thought."
- Warren Bennis, leadership researcher and author
"Customers who consider our servers rude should see the management."
- Sign in a restaurant
"Conventional
wisdom's view of teamwork is dangerously misleading. Great managers do
not believe that a productive team has camaraderie as its cornerstone
and team members who can play all roles equally well. On the contrary,
they define a productive team as one where each person knows which role
he plays best and where he is cast in that role most of the time."
- Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman, First, Break All The Rules: What The World's Greatest Managers Do Differently
"Frontline staff are natural mimics, they act like their management team despite all attempts to train them otherwise."
- Unknown
|
|
|
| Improvement Points Subscribers' Top Picks for March |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Practical Leadership Strategies for Peak Performance |
|
| |
|
|
| Leading a High Performance Culture |
|
| |
Supply Chain Logistics
will be hosting a unique, one-day workshop on June 3rd in Toronto, on
balancing processes and people. I will be outlining key management
processes and leadership principles and Supply Chain Management
President, Don Borsk, will showcase his company's powerful application
of them. We'll combine theory with results "on the ground". Click here for details and registration.
|
|
| |
|
I would love to hear from you on any of the discussions raised in this issue of the Leader Letter...or
any other matters concerning my work. Of course, I especially welcome
conversations exploring how I might help you or your team/organization
with a keynote presentation, management team retreat, or workshop.
Send me an e-mail at [email protected] or call me directly at (519) 748-5968.
I hope to connect with you again next month!
Jim
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | Please
post or pass this newsletter on to colleagues, clients, or associates
you think might be interested. If you received this newsletter from
someone else, and would like to subscribe, click here: www.clemmer.net/subscribe.shtml Phone: (519) 748-1044 ~ Fax: (519) 748-5813 ~ E-mail: [email protected] www.clemmer.net | | | | | |
| Copyright 2004, Jim Clemmer, The CLEMMER Group |